|
Action Planning Template
|
||||
|
Goal: Promote teachers to use collaborative
teaching to incorporate technology into the classrooms to improve student
performance.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1. Obtain permission
from elementary principal to conduct research inquiry.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Aug. 13-17, 2012
|
Written document
stating the elementary principal gives permission for this action research to
be conducted on their campus.
|
N/A
|
|
2. Survey teachers on comfort
level of use of technology tools including, but not limited to: basic computer
usage, Web 2.0 tools, iPads, and SMART Boards.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Aug. 20-25, 2012
|
Surveys created with
Socrative
|
Spreadsheet and graph
of results.
|
|
3. Select and obtain
permission from four teachers to conduct action research project in their
classrooms.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Aug. 27-Sept. 4, 2012
|
Written document
stating teacher permission to conduct action research in their
classrooms.
|
N/A
|
|
4. Interview the four
teachers in depth to gain a baseline for knowledge of technology (computers,
Web 2.0 tools, iPads, and SMART Boards).
|
Debra Sicking
|
Sept. 4-10, 2012
|
|
Interviewer notes will
be compared to end of year interview with teachers' results of collaborative
teaching with technology.
|
|
5. Collaborate lessons
with the four teachers to be conducted throughout the school year using
technology. Including grading rubrics
for collaborative grading.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Sept. 4-Oct. 1, 2012
|
|
Lesson plans and
rubrics from group planning
|
|
6. Provide technology support
for the four teachers throughout their lesson implementations.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Oct. 1, 2012- May 3,
2013
|
|
Technology support
satisfaction will be assessed in the final interview with the teachers after the
lessons have been completed.
|
|
7. Collect student grades on similar
assignments without cooperative teaching or technology
|
Debra Sicking
|
Oct. 1, 2012- May 10,
2013
|
Student grades
|
Student performance
standards will be compared to the performance standards and surveys of
students when using cooperative teaching and technology
|
|
8. Collect student grades on assignments and
projects with cooperative teaching and technology.
|
Debra Sicking
|
Oct. 1, 2012- May 10,
2013
|
Student grades
|
Student performance
standards will be compared to the performance standards and surveys of
students when not using cooperative teaching and technology
|
|
9. Re-survey teachers
on new comfort level of use of technology tools. Is there improvement with comfort and
usage?
|
Debra Sicking
|
May 6 – 17, 2013
|
Survey created and administered
with Socrative.
|
Spreadsheet and graph
of results.
|
|
10. Conduct exit
teacher interviews of the four teachers regarding teacher growth, cooperative
teaching strategies, and overall thought of cooperative teaching with
technology.
|
Debra Sicking
|
May 6 – 17, 2013
|
|
Interviewer notes will
be compared to beginning of year interview with teachers’ results of
collaborative teaching with technology.
|
|
11. Conduct student
surveys of cooperative teaching with technology assignments/projects compared
to traditional assignments/projects.
Is there an increase in satisfaction or interest in learning?
|
Debra Sicking
|
May 6 – 17, 2013
|
Survey created and administered
with Socrative.
|
Spreadsheet and graph
of results.
|
|
12. Analyze teacher
and student survey data.
|
Debra Sicking
|
May 17 – 24, 2013
|
Surveys and spreadsheet
of gathered data at beginning of year.
|
Analysis of survey
results.
|
|
13. Write a self-reflection based on interview
notes, survey data, student performance data, and overall observations.
|
Debra Sicking
|
May 24 – June 1, 2013
|
|
Self Reflection of
plan of action to take place.
|
|
14. Share information found on action research with
administrators, teachers, and other stock-holders.
|
Debra Sicking
|
August 2013
|
Presentation at
beginning of 2013-2014 school year.
|
Presentation
feedback.
|
Format based on Tool 7.1
from Examining What We Do to Improve Our
Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and
Combs, 2010)